Brazil parties hold convention to name presidential hopefuls
Candidates must be selected by August 5
Published in 19/07/2018 - 15:59 By Luiza Damé - Brasília
While Brazil’s definitive constellation of political coalitions remains uncertain, political parties start holding their national conventions on Friday (Jul. 20), to name their presidential candidates for the October elections. The names to run for president and vice-president must be approved in the convention by August 5 and registered with the Superior Electoral Court by August 15.
As it stands today, 18 people have informally announced their candidacy to the press—down from over 20 in recent months. Some gave up along the way, others were barred from running by political parties. The total number of hopefuls may be lower still, as some parties—like the Democrats (DEM), Solidarity (SD), and the Communist Party of Brazil (PCdoB)—are being pressed to refrain from naming a candidate of their own and instead support more competitive tickets.
The still unclear landscape, political scientist Leonardo Barreto argues, stems from a number of different reasons, not least of which the fact that the Planalto presidential palace is not exerting any influence on the process.
“When the Executive is solid, seeking re-election or attempting to name a successor, we tend to expect the government’s coalition to be reproduced, the opposition to organize itself, and even a third option to arise. This year, however, the government has no strong candidate, nor has there been significant support for someone in the opposition. This led to a high number of candidacies,” he pointed out.
In this connection, Barreto said, no name has stood out as favorite, which makes it difficult for political parties to take a stance, as they all seek to back someone with real chances of winning. Furthermore, the parties are interested in having a clear plan of government in case they win the electoral race.
To Barreto’s judgment, the conventions, aimed at starting the negotiations for future alliances, are likely to favor bigger parties, as they have “more means for exchange”—in other words, actual moves are likely to take into account the TV time to be granted to state campaigns, as well as funding, the amount of seats for federal and state representatives, and the amount of mayors—crucial to the outcome of the general elections.
Translation: Fabrício Ferreira - Edition: Carolina Pimentel / Nira Foster